|
The Language of The Age
Although the early history of the cinema is far from clear, around the
year 1900 film evolved from a penny arcade amusement into a
sophisticated language capable of narrative and emotion.
Little more than a century later that language is so ubiquitous that
books are in danger of becoming a niche market.
According to a 2004 National Endowment for the Arts survey, a dramatic
and increasing decline in literary reading in the United States
leaves fewer than half of America's adults reading literature.
Film's great attraction and its strength is its ability to harness the
immediacy of sight - seeing is believing - and though we may not
exactly believe what our eyes tell us, more than any other medium, film
makes it comfortable for us to suspend our disbelief.
Film's immediacy, however, is also its weakness; everything in a film
takes place in a constant "present tense." Film has no "was" or "will
be". To depict the past or the future, film has to resort to the
flashback or flash-forward, an inelegant device: The image begins to
blur, the dialogue echoes until the picture resolves into a past or
future scene. However, the new scene we are now watching is once again
in the present. In a film everything takes place in a perpetual state
of "is."
Not only does film speak in a continuous present, but also that
present tense has become increasingly abbreviated and compressed.
Between the 1930's and the 1950's the average length of a shot in a
typical A-picture was between eight and 11 seconds. After 1960, the
pulse of editing quickened until MTV and TV advertising have
accelerated cutting rates to the near-subliminal.
How do these idiosyncrasies of the language of the age, reflect the
weltanschauung of our age?
Not much more than a century ago, an American "night out" consisted
of listening to four hours of political debate without a break and no
ice-cream lady prowling the aisles. This required an audience attention
span that beggars the imagination. Flash forward to the reporting of
the Nixon/Kennedy Presidential elections in 1960. 60% of "sound bytes"
(an uninterrupted monologue by a reporter) are shorter than one
minute, and by the time George Bush Sr. took on Michael Dukakis in
1988, a sound byte has shrunk to 9.8 seconds, and not one is as long
as a minute.
Our age is unique in its inability to concentrate on anything for
very long. We even have a medical name for it: ADD and ADD/HDD.
Whether these conditions have always existed or whether they are
specific to our age is debatable, however there is an unmistakable
synchronicity between the acceleration of cutting rates in film and
television and the upsurge of ADD syndrome.
Basic to Jewish thought is the concept of Olam Habah - the World to
Come. The Rambam points out that if this world is called Olam Hazeh -
"this" world, then logically the next world should be called Olam
Hahoo - "that" world. Rather, the name, "the World to Come" is to
remind us there is no "this" world and "that" world that are different
entities. Everything we do in this world is revealed as it really is
in the World to Come. It is, quite literally, the world that comes
after this world for it is built entirely on this world.
In the cave of Machpelah at Chevron are buried Adam and Chava,
Avraham and Sara, Yitzchak and Rivka, Yaakov and Leah. The word
machpelah means "doubling," not in the sense of one thing added to
another, but rather the thing itself doubled. The defining trait of
those who are buried in Machpelah is that everything they did in this
world was transformed into a parallel existence, a doppelganger in the
World to Come. They doubled their entire present into their future;
the entire transcript of their lives was transmuted into an eternal
existence because their lives contained zero wastage.
A person can relate to the present in one of two ways: as the most
fleeting thing in existence, a will-o-the-wisp, an un-catchable frame
in the movie of one's life; or one can see the present as an
unpolished diamond waiting to be turned into eternity.
The syntax of film, the language of our age, encourages the
perception that the future and the past are not realities; all that
exists is a constant stream of "now."
From the Jewish view, however, success in life is measured by how
much of the present we can turn into future before it becomes the
past.
THE CERTAINTY OF DOUBT
between the words
the breath's caress
the silent parting moment
of the lips
to allow the doubt
that completes certainty
More articles available at Ohr Somayach's website. |
|
|
|